<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title><![CDATA[Election Week - Count Every Vote]]></title><description><![CDATA[Making sense of Election Week vote counts.]]></description><link>https://www.votecounts.org/</link><generator>Ghost 2.9</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 05:40:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.votecounts.org/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Still have a mail-in ballot? Drop it off in person]]></title><description><![CDATA[There is not enough time for ballots mailed by voters now to be received in time to count in several states.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/mail-ballots-outstanding/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f9b71c45f95070039494574</guid><category><![CDATA[Voting by Mail]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Count Every Vote Team]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 01:58:33 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1595126731003-755959b6baf8?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&amp;q=80&amp;fm=jpg&amp;crop=entropy&amp;cs=tinysrgb&amp;w=2000&amp;fit=max&amp;ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1595126731003-755959b6baf8?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&q=80&fm=jpg&crop=entropy&cs=tinysrgb&w=2000&fit=max&ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" alt="Still have a mail-in ballot? Drop it off in person"/><p>Millions of mail-in ballots have not been returned as Election Day looms. Campaigns fear that ballots mailed now may not be received by election officials in time to be counted. They are suggesting that anyone with a ballot return it to a drop off location or vote in-person.</p><h2 id="how-many-votes">How Many Votes?</h2><ul><li><strong>37 million</strong> are still outstanding according to <a href="https://electproject.github.io/Early-Vote-2020G/index.html">U.S. Election Project</a> data.</li><li>That’s out of <strong>92 million</strong> ballots sent to voters across the country.</li><li>About <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/10/28/mail-ballots-postal-service/">500,000 ballots</a> have not been returned in both Georgia and North Carolina.</li><li>Battleground states like Wisconsin are particularly worrisome after the U.S. Supreme Court <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/oct/26/wisconsin-mail-in-ballots-supreme-court-election-day?CMP=oth_b-aplnews_d-1">struck down</a> an extension to count absentee ballots received after Election Day.</li><li>There are 50,000 mail-in ballots still not received in <a href="https://electproject.github.io/Early-Vote-2020G/WI.html">Milwaukee County</a> alone.</li></ul><p>That number is more than twice Trump’s 2016 victory margin.</p><p>The one bright spot may be that some of these voters may have decided to vote in-person early or on Election Day. Voters can surrender their absentee or vote by-mail ballot in most states and vote in-person, or return their ballot to their polling site on Election Day.</p><h2 id="links">Links</h2><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-10-29/millions-mail-ballots-not-yet-returned-battleground-states"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Millions of mail-in ballots not yet returned in battleground states</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">Many mail-in ballots haven’t been returned in Florida, Pennsylvania, Nevada and Michigan. Voters are urged to return them in drop boxes, not the mail.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://www.latimes.com/apple-touch-icon.png" alt="Still have a mail-in ballot? Drop it off in person"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Associated Press</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">Los Angeles Times</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/ea9f81d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/4556x2392+0+323/resize/1200x630!/quality/90/?url&#x3D;https%3A%2F%2Fcalifornia-times-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F56%2Fe7%2Ff2504ccbf1d20dd926c4ccacc516%2F30ae73fe55504fa8b1adefd77d294e65" alt="Still have a mail-in ballot? Drop it off in person"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/oct/26/wisconsin-mail-in-ballots-supreme-court-election-day?CMP&#x3D;oth_b-aplnews_d-1"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Wisconsin can’t count mail-in ballots received after election day, supreme court rules</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">Court sided with Republicans in 5-3 ruling, awarding party a victory in crusade against expanding voting rights and access</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://static.guim.co.uk/images/favicon-32x32.ico" alt="Still have a mail-in ballot? Drop it off in person"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Maanvi Singh</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">The Guardian</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/a3774df1b43d182cb87ba3fba8f54f0c46ac0d45/0_116_3500_2101/master/3500.jpg?width&#x3D;1200&amp;height&#x3D;630&amp;quality&#x3D;85&amp;auto&#x3D;format&amp;fit&#x3D;crop&amp;overlay-align&#x3D;bottom%2Cleft&amp;overlay-width&#x3D;100p&amp;overlay-base64&#x3D;L2ltZy9zdGF0aWMvb3ZlcmxheXMvdGctZGVmYXVsdC5wbmc&amp;enable&#x3D;upscale&amp;s&#x3D;deefc2523ce9f3b233b27cc257fbdcec" alt="Still have a mail-in ballot? Drop it off in person"/></div></a></figure>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Conservative activist calls voter suppression a ‘Spiritual Battle’ in high-level gathering]]></title><description><![CDATA[Conservatives strategized how to prevent mail-in ballots from being sent to voters in closed-door meetings with conservative leaders, nonprofits and Trump administration officials, including the Secretary of Homeland Security.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/cnp-meeting/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f88ca922fcb5200397b18b2</guid><category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Wojciechowski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 22:21:55 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/10/8509EB1A-DC2A-46B1-8BBC-EA7C12592746.jpeg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>This is a spiritual battle we are in. This is good versus evil. We have to do everything we can to win.</blockquote><img src="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/10/8509EB1A-DC2A-46B1-8BBC-EA7C12592746.jpeg" alt="Conservative activist calls voter suppression a ‘Spiritual Battle’ in high-level gathering"/><p>Council on National Policy’s executive committee president, Bill Walton told attendees at a conservative training and coordination conference that the election “is a spiritual battle...” according to <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/council-national-policy-video/2020/10/14/367f24c2-f793-11ea-a510-f57d8ce76e11_story.html">video obtained by the Washington Post</a>. The videos cover meetings from three day gatherings in February and August 2020, and were recorded to share with activists, but not meant to be seen by media or the wider public.</p><p>CNP is a hub for conservative groups who appear to coordinate strategy and messaging at the events, which have taken place for over a decade. Participants lead several influential tax-exempt 501(c)(3) groups that are forbidden from overtly partisan efforts. Yet they can be seen on the videos discussing coordinated legal efforts to suppress votes and ballot harvesting plans.</p><h2 id="astounding-quotes-">Astounding Quotes:</h2><p><strong>Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton </strong> warned that ballots being sent to voters would help Democrats:<br><em>We need to stop those ballots from going out, and I want the lawyers here to tell us what to do.</em></br></p><p>Judicial Watch is the group that sued Hillary Clinton for access to her private email server, impacting the 2016 election.</p><p><strong>Charlie Kirk</strong> of the youth-focused Turning Points USA group <a href="https://www.huffpost.com/entry/video-shows-conservatives-being-told-not-to-fear-voter-suppressor-label-report_n_5f873f35c5b681f7da1e183a">celebrated coronavirus keeping universities closed</a> and students from voting:<br><em>So, please keep the campuses closed. Like, it’s a great thing.</em></br></p><p><strong>J. Christian Adams</strong> president of the Public Interest Legal Group and former Justice Department official warned that mail-in voting must be stopped and exhorted attendees:<br><em> Be not afraid of the accusations that you’re a voter suppressor, you’re a racist and so forth.</em></br></p><p><strong>Ralph Reed</strong> of the Faith &amp; Freedom Coalition described plans to collect ballots, while conservatives and <a href="https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1250067500190089217?s=21">Trump</a> have been claiming the practice is rife with fraud:<br><em> And so our organization is going to be harvesting ballots in churches. We’re going to be specifically going in not only to White evangelical churches, but into Hispanic and Asian churches, and collecting those ballots.</em></br></p><p><strong>Chad Wolf, Secretary of Homeland Security, who is in charge of election security and integrity</strong> was celebrated by the VP Mike Pence’s director of strategic initiatives, Paul Teller, for being a Trump loyalist:<br><em>I don’t know if you got to know Secretary Wolf’s team, sitting in the corner, they’re just a bunch of wingers. That’s like the most conservative table in the entire room, is Secretary Wolf’s team.</em></br></p><p>Teller said a <strong>CNP group meets with the White House</strong> to discuss personnel and policy every week:<br><em>It’s kind of this little secretive huddle that meets every Wednesday morning.</em></br></p><p>Nonprofit law experts warn that the gathering shows a flagrant violation of rules meant to keep tax exempt organizations from partisan activities that support candidates. Marcus Owens led the Exempt Organizations Division at the IRS for a decade and was shocked by the recordings:</p><blockquote>I’ve never seen anything like it on videotape and live. It’s almost like a movie.</blockquote><p>(Photo: <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/council-national-policy-video/2020/10/14/367f24c2-f793-11ea-a510-f57d8ce76e11_story.html">Screenshot from Washington Post</a> video)</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Republic Governor Closes Ballot Drop-off Locations in Texas]]></title><description><![CDATA[The governor is limiting counties to one drop-off point for absentee ballots per county, but can provide no evidence why this is necessary.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/republic-governor-closes-ballot-drop-off-locations-in-texas/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f7727d55214d3003952c7d2</guid><category><![CDATA[Voting by Mail]]></category><category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Count Every Vote Team]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2020 14:24:04 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1568807697609-e8aacc588ad9?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&amp;q=80&amp;fm=jpg&amp;crop=entropy&amp;cs=tinysrgb&amp;w=2000&amp;fit=max&amp;ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1568807697609-e8aacc588ad9?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&q=80&fm=jpg&crop=entropy&cs=tinysrgb&w=2000&fit=max&ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" alt="Republic Governor Closes Ballot Drop-off Locations in Texas"/><p>Gov. Greg Abbott issued an executive order this week <strong>closing ballot drop-off locations</strong> in several of Texas’ most populous counties. The order allows counties to only have <strong>one ballot drop point per county</strong>. The move is being chided as a blatant voter suppression tactic.</p><p><strong>Update</strong>: A <a href="https://www.texastribune.org/2020/10/02/texas-greg-abbott-ballot-drop-lawsuit/">suit has been filed</a> challenging Gov. Abbott's proclamation by the Texas League of United Latin American Citizens, League of Women Voters of Texas and others.</p><figure class="kg-card kg-embed-card"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">BREAKING: Gov. Abbott issues proclamation CLOSING (as of Oct. 2) satellite offices where voters can drop off completed mail-in ballots.<br>Counties can only have 1 dropoff point, he says.<br>Travis has 4, including 3 downtown.<br>Harris has 12.</br></br></br></p>&mdash; Chuck Lindell (@chucklindell) <a href="https://twitter.com/chucklindell/status/1311718569189806089?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"/>
</figure><p>Gov. Abbott’s laughable justification is that his actions are needed to protect the integrity of the election, but there is no evidence that giving people closer locations to drop-off ballots increases fraud and election fraud is rare than getting <a href="https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2016/apr/07/mark-pocan/which-happens-more-people-struck-lightning-or-peop/">struck by lightning.</a></p><blockquote>this isn’t security, it’s suppression<br>— <strong>Lina Hidalgo, Democratic Harris County Judge</strong></br></blockquote><p>Voter fraud in Texas has occurred at a rate of <strong>1 instance of fraud for every 18 million votes cast</strong>. Lightening strikes at the much higher rate of <strong>1 person for every 1.35 million in the state.</strong></p><p>Here’s what it means:</p><ul><li>Harris County, the <strong>most populous</strong> in the state and heavily Democrat, will shudder <strong>11 of it’s 12 sites</strong>.</li><li>Harris will only have one location though it is nearly 2,000 square miles and <strong>larger than the state of Rhode Island</strong>.</li><li>And it has the <strong>population of 26 U.S. states combined</strong>.</li><li>Democratic stronghold Travis county had <strong>4 sites</strong> to deal with the influx of voters dropping off absentee ballots.</li><li><strong>Poll watchers will be allowed</strong> at the drop-off sites. Texas has a strict voter ID law and there are fears GOP observers may challenge voters and slow down ballot drop-offs, causing lines and chaos.</li><li>Gov. Abbott’s office <strong>offered no evidence</strong> when challenged to explain how multiple drop-off sites decreased election security.</li></ul><p>Texas has been a <strong>reliably Republican state</strong> and is a bulwark for GOP electoral college victories <strong>with 38 electors</strong>. Only California with 55 carries more. But polls over the summer have shown Biden as close as 1 point behind Trump prompting fears that Texas, which is actually a majority minority state with a large Latino population, <strong>could be a tossup</strong>.</p><p>The Democratic Party Chair Gilberto Hinojosa responded to the news: <em>Republicans are on the verge of losing, so Governor Abbott is trying to adjust the rules last minute. We are creating a movement that will beat them at the ballot box on November 3, and there’s nothing these cheaters can do about it.</em></p><h2 id="links">Links</h2><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2020/10/01/greg-abbott-texas-vote-mail/"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Gov. Greg Abbott limits counties to one absentee ballot drop-off location, bolstering GOP efforts to restrict voting</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">The Republican governor’s order Thursday was a rebuke to large, Democratic counties that have set up numerous locations where voters may drop off their completed absentee ballots in person. Civil rights groups say it will suppress voting.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://www.texastribune.org/static/images/apple-touch-icon.358661eab2b3.png" alt="Republic Governor Closes Ballot Drop-off Locations in Texas"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Emma Platoff</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">The Texas Tribune</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://thumbnails.texastribune.org/qVlf2zLcYpYcxYLrb73y30a6QrQ&#x3D;/1200x804/smart/filters:quality(95)/static.texastribune.org/media/files/26ca2728cdb9afd45fbb62351ac09b1b/July%2014%20Runoff%20Dallas%20ST%20TT%2002.jpg" alt="Republic Governor Closes Ballot Drop-off Locations in Texas"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2020/10/02/texas-greg-abbott-ballot-drop-lawsuit/"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Voters, voting rights groups sue Gov. Greg Abbott over order to close ballot drop-off locations</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">The Texas and National Leagues of United Latin American Citizens, the League of Women Voters of Texas and two Texas voters asked a federal judge in Austin to overturn the governor’s order, which forced Travis and Harris counties — two of the st...</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://www.texastribune.org/static/images/apple-touch-icon.358661eab2b3.png" alt="Republic Governor Closes Ballot Drop-off Locations in Texas"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Emma Platoff</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">The Texas Tribune</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://thumbnails.texastribune.org/9S5NvbLMQ4Mlobt3aLwjV58njCc&#x3D;/1200x804/smart/filters:quality(95)/static.texastribune.org/media/files/2806c839aca69237cac93e26e385c857/First%20Day%20Mail-In%20Ballots%20AI%20TT%2013.jpg" alt="Republic Governor Closes Ballot Drop-off Locations in Texas"/></div></a></figure>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Grandfather Clause and White Supremacy]]></title><description><![CDATA[Grandfather clauses show just how far white supremacists will go to keep Black people from voting.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/grandfather-clause/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f74f690002cdc0039c045c5</guid><category><![CDATA[History]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Wojciechowski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 14:59:51 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1453945619913-79ec89a82c51?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&amp;q=80&amp;fm=jpg&amp;crop=entropy&amp;cs=tinysrgb&amp;w=2000&amp;fit=max&amp;ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1453945619913-79ec89a82c51?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&q=80&fm=jpg&crop=entropy&cs=tinysrgb&w=2000&fit=max&ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" alt="The Grandfather Clause and White Supremacy"/><p><em>Grandfather clause</em> and the term “grandfathered in” have become part of our everyday lexicon. But the term appeared for a very specific purpose during Reconstruction, the period after the U.S. Civil War.</p><p>The occupation of the South was coming to an end just as the <strong>15th Amendment</strong> passed making it unconstitutional to deny the vote based on “race, color, or previous condition of servitude." (Denial on the basis of sex was still fine.)</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/10/C0DB8E94-6D10-4F2E-81CB-0F578812ADA4.jpeg" class="kg-image" alt="The Grandfather Clause and White Supremacy"><figcaption>1879 political cartoon mocking literacy tests. Source: Wikimedia Commons</figcaption></img></figure><p>Free from federal oversight, southern states began passing laws to deny the vote based on other factors. They devised tests and poll taxes designed to keep former slaves from voting – the infamous <em>Jim Crow laws</em>. But they had a problem: many southern whites were poor and illiterate. The lawmakers <strong>needed a way to get racist white voters to the polls while disenfranchising Black men</strong>.</p><p>They came up with a loophole called the “Grandfather Clause.” In it’s simplest form it grandfathered white voters in by stating that <strong>anyone whose grandfather had voted</strong> in the past would be exempt from the poll tax or test. No slaves had grandfathers who voted in those states because they couldn’t vote before the Civil War or 15th Amendment.</p><p><a href="https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2013/10/21/239081586/the-racial-history-of-the-grandfather-clause?t=1601563733245">Historians note</a> that the grandfather clauses were not only about denying rights to Black people, but retaining power for the Democrats who stood opposed to Lincoln's Republican Party. Black voters supported Republican candidates.</p><blockquote>It was a means of enfranchising whites who might have been excluded by things like literacy clauses. <br>-- <strong>Michael Klarman</strong>, Harvard law</br></blockquote><p>More versions of grandfather clauses arose through the early 20th Century until they were struck down by the Supreme Court ruling in <em>Guinn v. United States, </em>dealing with an<em> </em>Oklahoma grandfather clause in 1915. The court made a point of noting that <strong>literacy tests were allowed</strong> as long as they were applied equally to all races. The justices were not concerned about the inherent racism in the law, but the way states had clearly flaunted the U.S. Constitution.</p><p>The Oklahoma Legislature met in a special session after the ruling and actually <strong>grandfathered in everyone registered by 1914</strong>. They would allow Black voters to register between April 30 and May 11, 1916. Those who did not would be disenfranchised forever. The law was not overturned by the Supreme Court until 1939.</p><p>The Voting Rights Act of 1965 invalidated Jim Crow laws and finally gave Black citizens equal voting rights – almost. A key provision, Section 5, that required certain counties and states to receive preclearance to change voting laws was struck down by the Supreme Court in the 2013 <em>Shelby County v. Holder</em> decision.</p><p>Felony clauses originally developed to stop freed Black men from voting also still keep mostly people of color from the polls. Laws barring felons from voting are still active <a href="https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/felon-voting-rights.aspx"> in 11 states</a> unless the returning citizens are pardoned by the governor. Florida Republicans have been fighting to keep those <a href="https://vote.ghost.io/bloomberg-millions-for-florida-voters/">convicted of felonies from voting</a> despite voters in the state overwhelmingly supporting restoration of their rights.</p><p>Grandfather clauses no longer apply, but like the term "Grandfathered in," anti-Black voting laws have become accepted and commonplace – over 150 years after slavery ended in the United States.</p><h2 id="links">Links</h2><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/03/us/racism-massachusetts-grandfathering.html"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Massachusetts Court Won’t Use Term ‘Grandfathering,’ Citing Its Racist Origins</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">The practice was “adopted by some states after the Civil War in an effort to disenfranchise African-American voters,” the court noted.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://www.nytimes.com/vi-assets/static-assets/apple-touch-icon-28865b72953380a40aa43318108876cb.png" alt="The Grandfather Clause and White Supremacy"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Azi Paybarah</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">NYTimes</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://static01.nyt.com/images/2020/08/03/multimedia/03xp-grandfathering/03xp-grandfathering-facebookJumbo.jpg" alt="The Grandfather Clause and White Supremacy"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/07/how-shelby-county-broke-america/564707/"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">How a Pivotal Voting Rights Act Case Broke America</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">In the five years since the landmark decision, the Supreme Court has set the stage for a new era of white hegemony.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/static/a/theatlantic/img/lacroix/apple-touch-icon-ipad-retina.398a2c61e146.png" alt="The Grandfather Clause and White Supremacy"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Vann R. Newkirk II</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">The Atlantic</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://cdn.theatlantic.com/thumbor/-80A6SDwtQ8UDInPq7yutZHDe80&#x3D;/0x371:2839x1849/960x500/media/img/mt/2018/07/AP_670718012/original.jpg" alt="The Grandfather Clause and White Supremacy"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/06/voting-rights-and-the-supreme-court-the-impossible-literacy-test-louisiana-used-to-give-black-voters.html"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Take the Impossible “Literacy” Test Louisiana Gave Black Voters in the 1960s</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">The Vault is Slate’s new history blog. Like us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter @slatevault, and find us on Tumblr. Find out more about what this...</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://slate.com/media/sites/slate-com/icon.196x196.png" alt="The Grandfather Clause and White Supremacy"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Rebecca Onion</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">Slate</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://compote.slate.com/images/67abc2f7-9b2e-4c88-a0dc-d0f2fe08d86a.jpg" alt="The Grandfather Clause and White Supremacy"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://vote.ghost.io/bloomberg-millions-for-florida-voters/"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Bloomberg Raises Millions to Restore Voting Rights in Florida</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">Celebrities and high-profile figures came together to pay fees required for ‘returning citizens’ to regain voting rights.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://votecounts.org/favicon.png" alt="The Grandfather Clause and White Supremacy"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Jason Wojciechowski</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">Vote✔️Counts</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://votecounts.org/content/images/2020/09/BA8099F3-C117-440E-B324-8BD0E7634D22.jpeg" alt="The Grandfather Clause and White Supremacy"/></div></a></figure>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump Campaign Spent Year Preparing Election Legal Challenge]]></title><description><![CDATA[Trump campaign and RNC lawyers have already written legal pleadings ready to be filed on Election Day or immediately after.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/trump-legal-effort/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f732face1f52300399618bf</guid><category><![CDATA[Election Law]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Count Every Vote Team]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:06:29 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1593115057322-e94b77572f20?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&amp;q=80&amp;fm=jpg&amp;crop=entropy&amp;cs=tinysrgb&amp;w=2000&amp;fit=max&amp;ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1593115057322-e94b77572f20?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&q=80&fm=jpg&crop=entropy&cs=tinysrgb&w=2000&fit=max&ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" alt="Trump Campaign Spent Year Preparing Election Legal Challenge"/><p>For over a year the Trump campaign and Republican Party have been preparing for an Election Day and post-election legal fight.</p><p>According to a <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/27/trump-legal-network-election-day-fight-422035">report in Politico</a>, Republicans plan to dispute mail-in ballots, questioning:</p><ol><li>Authenticity of mail-in votes;</li><li>Deadlines for mail-in ballots.</li></ol><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/578CDFD8-24E9-4EE5-89DD-C1DC2474C753.jpeg" class="kg-image" alt="Trump Campaign Spent Year Preparing Election Legal Challenge" srcset="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/size/w600/2020/09/578CDFD8-24E9-4EE5-89DD-C1DC2474C753.jpeg 600w, https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/578CDFD8-24E9-4EE5-89DD-C1DC2474C753.jpeg 912w" sizes="(min-width: 720px) 720px"><figcaption>Purple shows voters likely to vote by mail (<a href="https://www.tableau.com/data-insights/us-election-2020/vote-by-mail">Source</a>)</figcaption></img></figure><p>The goal of the legal effort is clearly to challenge as many mail-in ballots as possible, especially following <a href="https://www.axios.com/axios-surveymonkey-tableau-poll-1af180de-2ebb-496f-84be-17ff8143480a.html">polling</a> that suggest most Democrats will vote by mail.</p><blockquote>We will spend whatever it takes to make sure the election is conducted orderly and that we push back on the Democrats’ litigation to strike down various safeguards on the election process. </blockquote><p><strong>—</strong> Justin Reiner, chief counsel for Republican National Committee</p><p>Here’s what legal effort looks like:</p><ul><li><strong>Three major law firms</strong> have been hired.</li><li><strong>20-person team coordinating</strong> efforts across the Trump Campaign, RNC and committees supporting Republican Senate and House Candidates.</li><li><strong>Thousands of volunteer attorneys</strong> and poll watchers are engaged.</li><li>Focus on <strong>17 key swing states</strong> including Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Florida and North Carolina.</li><li><strong>Pre-written legal pleadings</strong> ready to be filed on Election Day or immediately after.</li><li><strong>$20 Million</strong> was already committed to the pre-election legal effort.</li></ul><p>The Democrats have prepared the own legal effort, which has already been active fighting for greater access to mail-in voting and countering GOP suppression efforts.</p><p>Both campaigns are preparing for what looks increasingly like a protracted post-election period.</p><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/27/trump-legal-network-election-day-fight-422035"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Trump readies thousands of attorneys for election fight</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">Dozens of lawyers from three major firms have been hired. Thousands of volunteer attorneys and poll watchers across the country have been recruited.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://www.politico.com/android-chrome-192x192.png" alt="Trump Campaign Spent Year Preparing Election Legal Challenge"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Anita Kumar</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">POLITICO</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://static.politico.com/dc/fb/22e84320402c8a028718cd183a89/200926-donald-trump-ap-773.jpg" alt="Trump Campaign Spent Year Preparing Election Legal Challenge"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/14/us/politics/biden-legal-challenges-trump.html"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Biden Creates Legal War Room, Preparing for a Big Fight Over Voting</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">With two former solicitors general and hundreds of lawyers, the Biden campaign is bracing for an extended legal battle and hoping to maintain trust in the electoral process.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://www.nytimes.com/vi-assets/static-assets/apple-touch-icon-28865b72953380a40aa43318108876cb.png" alt="Trump Campaign Spent Year Preparing Election Legal Challenge"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Shane Goldmacher</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">NYTimes</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://static01.nyt.com/images/2020/09/14/us/politics/14biden-legal1/14biden-legal1-facebookJumbo.jpg" alt="Trump Campaign Spent Year Preparing Election Legal Challenge"/></div></a></figure>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Maine Will Have Ranked Choice Voting in November]]></title><description><![CDATA[A court ruling has cleared the way for Maine to use ranked choice voting in November, making it the first state in the country to do so for a national election.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/maine-ranked-choice/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f7104c25682e100397ac2e7</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Count Every Vote Team]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 10:24:04 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/6C3B7F31-FAB2-4D1C-BC50-BAF270707A9F.jpeg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/6C3B7F31-FAB2-4D1C-BC50-BAF270707A9F.jpeg" alt="Maine Will Have Ranked Choice Voting in November"/><p>Maine will be the first state in the U.S. to use ranked choice voting in a presidential election this November. Ranked choice voting has faced constant opposition from Republicans and a few other groups in Maine who sought to block it by putting a new referendum on this year’s ballot. Over 1,000 petition signatures were invalidated by a judge, which left the referendum short of the total signatures needed to get on the 2020 ballot. That means Maine will go ahead with ranked choice voting this election.</p><figure class="kg-card kg-embed-card"><iframe width="612" height="344" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8Z2fRPRkWvY?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen=""/></figure><h2 id="how-it-works">How It Works</h2><ul><li>There will be five presidential candidates on the ballot.</li><li>Voters rank each candidate in order of preference.</li><li>If no candidate receives a majority of first-place votes then last-place finishers are eliminated.</li><li>Their votes then go to the next choice on that ballot.</li><li>This continues until a candidate reaches a majority.</li><li>Results may be delayed for a week as all ballots will be transported to Augusta for computer-aided tabulation.</li></ul><p>Ranked choice will be used in the U.S. House and Senate races in the state.</p><p>Maine is one of the few states already to divide their electors and could be decisive in a close race. 1 million ballots</p><h2 id="links">Links</h2><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://apnews.com/b5ddd0854037e9687e952cd79e1526df"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Ranked choice voting in Maine a go for presidential election</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — Ranked choice voting will be used for the first time in a presidential race in the U.S. under a ruling Tuesday by the Maine Supreme Court, which concluded that a GOP-led...</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://apnews.com/branding/favicon/256.png" alt="Maine Will Have Ranked Choice Voting in November"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">DAVID SHARP</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">Associated Press</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/c1204998c35a47699a10885c81650337/3000.jpeg" alt="Maine Will Have Ranked Choice Voting in November"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.sunjournal.com/2020/09/22/maine-high-court-clears-way-for-ranked-choice-voting-in-presidential-contest/"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Maine’s supreme court clears way for ranked-choice voting in presidential election</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">The court overturned a ruling that would have put a ‘people’s veto’ referendum on the November ballot, thereby blocking Maine voters’ option to rank the presidential candidates.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://multifiles.pressherald.com/uploads/sites/11/2018/05/cropped-sj-default-250x250.png" alt="Maine Will Have Ranked Choice Voting in November"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Follow on Twitter</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">Lewiston Sun Journal</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://multifiles.pressherald.com/uploads/sites/10/2020/07/18530713_20200717_RCVtabulation_5192-1024x833.jpg" alt="Maine Will Have Ranked Choice Voting in November"/></div></a></figure><p>(<em>Photo from <a href="https://www.fairvote.org/ranked_choice_voting_wins_in_2020">FairVote</a> </em>)</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Could Toss 100,00 Ballots Over Technicality]]></title><description><![CDATA[Trump won Pennsylvania by 44,000 votes in 2016. Now a court ruling could prevent officials from counting that many votes in Philadelphia alone.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/pennsylvania-politicians-save-votes/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f73960be1f52300399618da</guid><category><![CDATA[Voting by Mail]]></category><category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Count Every Vote Team]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 20:35:00 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/2A98E932-EA6B-41CE-BBB7-6F469B66F7FB.png" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/2A98E932-EA6B-41CE-BBB7-6F469B66F7FB.png" alt="Pennsylvania Could Toss 100,00 Ballots Over Technicality"/><p>Officials are sounding the alarm that Pennsylvania 2020 could be worse than Florida 2000. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in <em>Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar (2020)</em> that absentee ballots without a ‘secrecy envelope’ cannot be counted as the law stands. Secrecy envelopes are a secure inner envelope that contain a ballot, inside the main ‘declaration’ envelope with postage information. 'Naked ballots' arrive without the inner envelope or with it not fully closed. </p><p>The number is expected to be especially high since most Pennsylvania voters have not voted by mail before but many will because of the pandemic, <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/22/election-official-warns-pennsylvania-naked-ballot-ruling-could-jeopardize-votes.html">concerning election officials</a>.</p><figure class="kg-card kg-embed-card"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Today, I sent a letter to legislative leaders re: my concerns on the recent <a href="https://twitter.com/SupremeCtofPA?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SupremeCtofPA</a> decision requiring ballots to be in secrecy envelopes to be counted &amp; asked for a legislative fix. I don’t want 100K+ legit PA ballots thrown out for a technicality. <a href="https://t.co/8Q6owxnmNZ">https://t.co/8Q6owxnmNZ</a> <a href="https://t.co/usbcIwDcbS">pic.twitter.com/usbcIwDcbS</a></p>&mdash; Lisa Deeley (@DeeleyforPhilly) <a href="https://twitter.com/DeeleyforPhilly/status/1308072807461462018?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 21, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"/>
</figure><p>100,000 ballots may be disqualified in the state if this ruling stands and the legislator does not change the law according to one Philadelphia commissioner. Trump’s 2016 margin of victory was 44,000 votes in the Keystone State.</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/8EBAA009-2CB7-4571-B4BA-D6F136AA9ECD.jpeg" class="kg-image" alt="Pennsylvania Could Toss 100,00 Ballots Over Technicality" srcset="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/size/w600/2020/09/8EBAA009-2CB7-4571-B4BA-D6F136AA9ECD.jpeg 600w, https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/size/w1000/2020/09/8EBAA009-2CB7-4571-B4BA-D6F136AA9ECD.jpeg 1000w, https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/size/w1600/2020/09/8EBAA009-2CB7-4571-B4BA-D6F136AA9ECD.jpeg 1600w, https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/8EBAA009-2CB7-4571-B4BA-D6F136AA9ECD.jpeg 2132w" sizes="(min-width: 720px) 720px"><figcaption>Instructions from the PAVotes Website</figcaption></img></figure><h2 id="why-secrecy-envelopes-are-unnecessary-">Why secrecy envelopes are unnecessary:</h2><ul><li><strong>30,000–40,000 votes</strong> will likely be tossed in Philadelphia alone.</li><li>Secrecy envelopes are a vestige of <strong>a time when individual polling stations counted absentee ballots</strong>. The ballots would all be removed from the declaration envelope to protect voter anonymity.</li><li>But now the ballots are counted centrally with special extraction desks that can remove <strong>12,000 ballots an hour</strong>.</li><li><strong>Without the extra envelope 24,000</strong> could be extracted and another <a href="https://files7.philadelphiavotes.com/announcements/9-21-2020_Deeley_Letter_on_Secrecy_Envelope.pdf">34,000 scanned according to City Commissioner Deeley</a>(PDF).</li><li>The massive influx of mail ballots due to COVID-19 will cause costly delays and thousands of ballots to be rejected without cause.</li><li>And municipal, county and state government will need to spend hundreds of thousands on voter education and possibly more on legal disputes.</li></ul><p>Naked ballots were counted without issue in past elections, but Republican observers began raising objections in 2019 and during the 2020 primary vote — setting the stage to challenge these ballots during the General Election.</p><blockquote>…it is the naked ballot ruling that is going to cause electoral chaos. </blockquote><p><strong>— Lisa Deeley, Philadelphia City Commissioner, Chairwoman</strong></p><p>It will most likely require a new law by the state legislature to remove the arcane requirement and count naked ballots.</p><h2 id="links">Links</h2><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.phillymag.com/news/2020/05/14/pennsylvania-mail-in-ballot-instructions/"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Here’s Everything You Need to Know About Filling in Your Surprisingly Complicated Mail-in Ballot</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">It’s not as simple as checking off a few boxes. A Philadelphian’s guide to making sure your vote in the Pennsylvania primary is counted.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://cdn10.phillymag.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2017/10/cropped-phillymag-favicon-192x192.png" alt="Pennsylvania Could Toss 100,00 Ballots Over Technicality"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Claire Sasko</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">Philadelphia Magazine</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://cdn10.phillymag.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/05/documents-ballot-social.jpg" alt="Pennsylvania Could Toss 100,00 Ballots Over Technicality"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/26/pennsylvania-election-official-lisa-deely-secrecy-envelope-sot-vpx-ebof.cnn"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Mail-in voting: ‘Secrecy envelope’ has state election official concerned - CNN Video</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">Pennsylvania election official Lisa Deely says she is very concerned over how complicated the mail-in voting process is in her state as the number of mail-in ballots are at a record number for the 2020 presidential election.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/.e/img/3.0/global/misc/apple-touch-icon.png" alt="Pennsylvania Could Toss 100,00 Ballots Over Technicality"><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">CNN</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200925205612-erin-burnett-lisa-deely-split-for-video-super-tease.jpg" alt="Pennsylvania Could Toss 100,00 Ballots Over Technicality"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/22/election-official-warns-pennsylvania-naked-ballot-ruling-could-jeopardize-votes.html"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Philadelphia election official warns ‘naked ballot’ ruling could jeopardize 100,000 Pennsylvania votes</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">A top elections official in Philadelphia is warning that 100,000 ballots could be rejected because of a recent ruling regarding so-called “naked ballots.”</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://www.cnbc.com/favicon.ico" alt="Pennsylvania Could Toss 100,00 Ballots Over Technicality"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Tucker Higgins</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">CNBC</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/image/106562124-15911226482020-06-02t180613z_210748780_rc261h9h5eup_rtrmadp_0_usa-election-pennsylvania.jpeg?v&#x3D;1591122702" alt="Pennsylvania Could Toss 100,00 Ballots Over Technicality"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.inquirer.com/politics/election/pennsylvania-naked-ballots-supreme-court-philadelphia-20200921.html"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">How ‘naked ballots’ in Pennsylvania could cost Joe Biden the election</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">The 2020 presidential election could come down to envelopes. Here’s what you need to know.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://media.inquirer.com/designimages/touch-icon-192x192.png" alt="Pennsylvania Could Toss 100,00 Ballots Over Technicality"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Jonathan Lai</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">The Philadelphia Inquirer</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://www.inquirer.com/resizer/17FY_6Z7BOnr4UHN0rhcqtE1d6A&#x3D;/1200x0/center/middle/www.inquirer.com/resizer/xr235XbHiAcYmTRsNsechlj3Zmk&#x3D;/1200x0/center/middle/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/pmn/CKCPX27WHNHB3I5EZNYGAYZ6PU.jpg" alt="Pennsylvania Could Toss 100,00 Ballots Over Technicality"/></div></a></figure>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Thousands of North Carolina Votes May Be Disqualified Due to Lack of Witness Signatures]]></title><description><![CDATA[Black voters’ s ballots make up 43% of those rejected for incomplete witness signatures.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/nc-ballots-rejected/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f7097f7fbc71200395e90ff</guid><category><![CDATA[Voting by Mail]]></category><category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Count Every Vote Team]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2020 14:28:41 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/1808DD0C-57AF-4584-B7E0-3612EF1B6A5B.png" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/1808DD0C-57AF-4584-B7E0-3612EF1B6A5B.png" alt="Thousands of North Carolina Votes May Be Disqualified Due to Lack of Witness Signatures"/><p>Disability advocates and other voting rights groups in North Carolina lost a legal fight to throw out the requirement of witness statements on absentee ballots. The requirement is emerging as the top cause of rejected ballots in the state.</p><h2 id="so-far-">So far…</h2><ul><li><strong>1,700 of the 200,000</strong> total ballots returned have been rejected.</li><li><strong>Black voters make up 43% of ballots rejected</strong> for this reason, yet they have cast only 16% of the votes.</li><li><strong>Black voters ballots are rejected at four times</strong> the rate as white voters according to <a href="https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/north-carolina-is-already-rejecting-black-voters-mail-in-ballots-more-often-than-white-voters/">analysis by FiveThirtyEight</a>.</li><li>NC has the most Black voters of tossup states <a href="https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article245411685.html">expected to decide the election</a> and those voters reliably vote for Democrats.</li><li><strong>Ballot curing</strong> the process of fixing errors on absentee ballots has been <a href="https://www.ncsbe.gov/news/press-releases/2020/09/22/state-board-updates-cure-process-ensure-more-lawful-votes-count">streamlined</a> as part of the legal settlement in NC.</li><li><strong>Witness signatures were struck down in neighboring South Carolina</strong> when a judge ruled the requirement would “increase the risk of contracting COVID-19.”</li><li>12 states have the witness requirement, but <strong>none of the 5 states that conduct all elections by mail do</strong>, and they see no fraud from this.</li></ul><p>Absentee ballot fraud <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/30/us/mccrae-dowless-indictment.html">did occur in a 2018 congressional race in North Carolina</a>, but the forged ballots were in service of the Republican candidate.</p><h2 id="links">Links</h2><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/voters-struggling-witness-rules-early-voting-n1241117"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Voters struggling with witness rules in early voting</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">President Trump is facing a bipartisan backlash for refusing to commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he loses the election, but he’s showing no sign of backing down. NBC’s Peter Alexander reports for TODAY from the White House.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://nodeassets.nbcnews.com/cdnassets/projects/ramen/favicon/nbcnews/all-other-sizes-PNG.ico/android-icon-192x192.png" alt="Thousands of North Carolina Votes May Be Disqualified Due to Lack of Witness Signatures"><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">NBC News</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://media3.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2020_39/3415046/200925-ballots-north-carolina-mn-14222_303f9e834686d3ab43da07a428dc8ae3.nbcnews-fp-1200-630.JPG" alt="Thousands of North Carolina Votes May Be Disqualified Due to Lack of Witness Signatures"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/30/us/mccrae-dowless-indictment.html"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Election Fraud in North Carolina Leads to New Charges for Republican Operative</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">L. McCrae Dowless Jr., who was previously indicted over work in other elections, was charged in connection to efforts related to the 2018 general elections.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://www.nytimes.com/vi-assets/static-assets/apple-touch-icon-28865b72953380a40aa43318108876cb.png" alt="Thousands of North Carolina Votes May Be Disqualified Due to Lack of Witness Signatures"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Alan Blinder</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">NYTimes</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://static01.nyt.com/images/2019/06/18/us/00northcarolina-dowless/00northcarolina-dowless-facebookJumbo.jpg" alt="Thousands of North Carolina Votes May Be Disqualified Due to Lack of Witness Signatures"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.ncsbe.gov/news/press-releases/2020/09/22/state-board-updates-cure-process-ensure-more-lawful-votes-count"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">State Board Updates Cure Process to Ensure More Lawful Votes Count | NCSBE</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">The State Board of Elections on Tuesday announced changes to the absentee voting process to make it easier for a voter to fix problems with their absentee ballot.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://files.nc.gov/sbe/favicon.png?_M7gd4EpcyI3dwd92aXx_cG8Q6KWI8U3" alt="Thousands of North Carolina Votes May Be Disqualified Due to Lack of Witness Signatures"><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">NCSBE</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://files.nc.gov/sbe/SBE-logo.png?Z.xcgNlcVv9qKre19XrLtaBVkeEvDhT0" alt="Thousands of North Carolina Votes May Be Disqualified Due to Lack of Witness Signatures"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/north-carolina-is-already-rejecting-black-voters-mail-in-ballots-more-often-than-white-voters/"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">North Carolina Is Already Rejecting Black Voters’ Mail-In Ballots More Often Than White Voters’</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">In every election, a small percentage of mail-in ballots get rejected. But this election is likely to have a whole lot of mail-in ballots. And in an election wh…</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://fivethirtyeight.com/wp-content/themes/espn-fivethirtyeight/assets/images/fivethirtyeight-logo-touch.png?v&#x3D;1.0.23" alt="Thousands of North Carolina Votes May Be Disqualified Due to Lack of Witness Signatures"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Kaleigh Rogers</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">FiveThirtyEight</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://fivethirtyeight.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/REJECTED-BALLOTS-16x9-1.png?w&#x3D;575" alt="Thousands of North Carolina Votes May Be Disqualified Due to Lack of Witness Signatures"/></div></a></figure>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bloomberg Raises Millions to Restore Voting Rights in Florida]]></title><description><![CDATA[Celebrities and high-profile figures came together to pay fees required for ‘returning citizens’ to regain voting rights.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/bloomberg-millions-for-florida-voters/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f70ff995682e100397ac2be</guid><category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category><category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Wojciechowski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 21:21:00 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/BA8099F3-C117-440E-B324-8BD0E7634D22.jpeg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/BA8099F3-C117-440E-B324-8BD0E7634D22.jpeg" alt="Bloomberg Raises Millions to Restore Voting Rights in Florida"/><p>Michael Bloomberg helped raise $22 million so that voters convicted of felonies could vote in Florida. A new amendment allows these individuals to vote after they have completed their prison sentence but the Republican governor and lawmakers have tried to limit who the changes apply to.</p><h2 id="what-to-know">What to Know</h2><ul><li><strong>Stopping Black folks from voting</strong> was the purpose of laws in Florida and other states barring felons from voting after the civil war and Civil Rights Movement.</li><li><strong>Amendment 4 passed overwhelmingly in 2018</strong> restoring voting rights to felons who completed their sentences.</li><li>Florida’s Republican legislators defined ‘sentence completion’ as paying all fines and restitution. This was a tactic to <strong>stop the new voters from registering</strong>.</li><li>A federal court ruled in favor of Republicans agreeing that fines and restitution had to be paid by the new voters.</li><li>Florida Rights Restoration Coalition is paying fines for those <strong>who owe $1,500 or less</strong>.</li><li><strong>31,000 new voters</strong> meet that criteria.</li><li>The group raised $5 million before the Bloomberg-led effort added $17 million.</li></ul><p>Florida’s 29 electors are crucial in every election and the state was given to George W. Bush in 2000 by a margin of 537 votes. Later counts showed that <a href="https://theintercept.com/2018/11/10/democrats-should-remember-al-gore-won-florida-in-2000-but-lost-the-presidency-with-a-preemptive-surrender/">Bush actually lost Florida though</a>.</p><p>Bloomberg raised the funds with support from John Legend, LeBron James, Michael Jordan, MTV, Comedy Central, VH1, Ben &amp; Jerry’s, Levi Strauss &amp; Co., the Miami Dolphins, the Orlando Magic, the Miami Heat and Stephen Spielberg.</p><p>You can <a href="https://connect.clickandpledge.com/Organization/frcceducationfund/campaign/amendment4fund/Donation/">donate to the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition fund here</a>.</p><h2 id="links">Links</h2><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://apnews.com/1bc5a068ccfc864854a186c143fc39cb"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Bloomberg raises millions to help Florida felons vote</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — Just days after after Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis won a court victory to keep felons from voting until they’ve paid off fines, restitution and court fees, billionaire Mike...</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://apnews.com/branding/favicon/256.png" alt="Bloomberg Raises Millions to Restore Voting Rights in Florida"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">BRENDAN FARRINGTON</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">Associated Press</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/e3f83bd802ff45aa9f587097a6ed5fca/3000.jpeg" alt="Bloomberg Raises Millions to Restore Voting Rights in Florida"/></div></a></figure>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wisconsin voters get more time to return ballots]]></title><description><![CDATA[A federal judge extends absentee ballot deadlines noting that existing rules would disenfranchise voters.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/wisconsin-voters-more-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f6a04ab92d5a100398ecb85</guid><category><![CDATA[Voting by Mail]]></category><category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Count Every Vote Team]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:20:14 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1595126930630-57c02597c734?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&amp;q=80&amp;fm=jpg&amp;crop=entropy&amp;cs=tinysrgb&amp;w=2000&amp;fit=max&amp;ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1595126930630-57c02597c734?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&q=80&fm=jpg&crop=entropy&cs=tinysrgb&w=2000&fit=max&ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" alt="Wisconsin voters get more time to return ballots"/><p>Wisconsin voters will have six extra days for their ballots to be received by clerks after the November 3 election. This is thanks to a ruling by a federal judge in Wisconsin</p><h2 id="what-the-ruling-says-">What the Ruling Says:</h2><ul><li>Absentee ballots will be counted if they are <strong>postmarked by November 3 — Election Day.</strong></li><li>And <strong>received by Nov. 9.</strong></li><li>Previously ballots had to be received by Election Day.</li><li><strong>Oct. 21 is the new deadline to register</strong> online or through the mail to vote. A one week extension.</li><li><strong>Poll workers can work in any county</strong> thanks to the ruling. Old rules kept workers from working outside the county where they reside, but this move will address worker shortages.</li></ul><p><strong>However, a preemptive stay is in effect on this ruling</strong> because the judge expects appeals.</p><p>Wisconsin voters have until Oct. 29 to request an absentee ballot, but the judge noted that the old guidelines would make it impossible for those who requested ballots on that date to have them returned by Nov. 3. A request to strike down certain ID laws and remove the requirement for a witness signature on ballots was not granted.</p><h2 id="links">Links</h2><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://eu.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/09/21/wisconsin-absentee-ballots-postmarked-november-3-counted-delay-presidential-election-results/5808975002/"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Judge gives Wisconsin voters more time to return absentee ballots</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">The ruling means the nation may have to wait for a week after Election Day to get results in a crucial swing state.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://www.gannett-cdn.com/sites/jsonline/images/site-nav-logo@2x.png" alt="Wisconsin voters get more time to return ballots"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Patrick Marley</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">Milwaukee Journal Sentinel</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2020/08/11/PMJS/a5bc0959-1af5-4698-9ffa-eb104c712340-VOTE_11313.JPG?crop&#x3D;5452,3067,x0,y0&amp;width&#x3D;3200&amp;height&#x3D;1801&amp;format&#x3D;pjpg&amp;auto&#x3D;webp" alt="Wisconsin voters get more time to return ballots"/></div></a></figure>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Judge Blocks Trump’s Postal Service Changes Calling Them ‘Politically Motivated’]]></title><description><![CDATA[A U.S. District Court judge has ordered the Postmaster General to halt policies that experts say have been holding up the mail and could harm vote-by-mail efforts.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/judge-blocks-usps/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f63d5084800d200398edd8e</guid><category><![CDATA[Voting by Mail]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Wojciechowski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:58:06 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1523495706668-1fd3d480bc63?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&amp;q=80&amp;fm=jpg&amp;crop=entropy&amp;cs=tinysrgb&amp;w=2000&amp;fit=max&amp;ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>The states have demonstrated that the defendants are involved in a politically motivated attack on the efficiency of the Postal Service. They have also demonstrated that this attack on the Postal Service is likely to irreparably harm the states’ ability to administer the 2020 general election</blockquote><img src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1523495706668-1fd3d480bc63?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&q=80&fm=jpg&crop=entropy&cs=tinysrgb&w=2000&fit=max&ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" alt="Judge Blocks Trump’s Postal Service Changes Calling Them ‘Politically Motivated’"/><p>-- Stanley A. Bastian, chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington</p><h2 id="key-points">Key Points</h2><ul><li><strong>Washington  and 13 other sstates</strong> filed the suit.</li><li><strong>Trump and Postmaster General Louis DeJoy</strong> were named as defendands in the suit.</li><li><strong>USPS was already set to scrap 671 sorting machines</strong> when DeJoy took over.</li><li><strong>Dejoy's main change was stricter dispatch schedule</strong> and limiting overtime, which has caused a massive backlog.</li><li><strong>Timely mailing and returning of ballots</strong> will be irreparably harmed by DeJoy's measures according to the ruling.</li></ul><p>The USPS lawyers claimed that nothing unusual has been going on and that the only difference is the Postal Service communicating more openly about potential problems with states. But the judge saw enough evidence to make the striking claim that Trump is using the USPS for his own political purposes to hamper the election.</p><h2 id="links">Links</h2><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://apple.news/AMwiz7mp6QNquTf8mj5vo5g"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Federal judge issues temporary injunction against USPS changes amid concerns about mail slowdowns — The Washington Post</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">The decision could cast the Postal Service into more tumult just as states have begun to send out mail ballots for the Nov. 3 election.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://apple.news/images/apple-touch-icon.png" alt="Judge Blocks Trump’s Postal Service Changes Calling Them ‘Politically Motivated’"/></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://c.apple.news/AgEXQU13aXo3bXA2UU5xdVRmOG1qNXZvNWcAMA" alt="Judge Blocks Trump’s Postal Service Changes Calling Them ‘Politically Motivated’"/></div></a></figure>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Experts warn online voting will not be as secure as online banking, but they are asking the wrong question]]></title><description><![CDATA[Voter anonymity makes the prospect of online voting more difficult than online banking according to experts. But banking can teach us about securing our elections now.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/online-voting-banking/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f60a411986a4b0039c77167</guid><category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Wojciechowski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 11:30:42 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1574288061782-da2d3f79a72e?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&amp;q=80&amp;fm=jpg&amp;crop=entropy&amp;cs=tinysrgb&amp;w=2000&amp;fit=max&amp;ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1574288061782-da2d3f79a72e?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&q=80&fm=jpg&crop=entropy&cs=tinysrgb&w=2000&fit=max&ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" alt="Experts warn online voting will not be as secure as online banking, but they are asking the wrong question"/><p>Timothy B. Lee investigated secure internet voting for <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/09/why-online-voting-is-harder-than-online-banking/">Ars Technica</a> and ended up breaking down the differences that make online banking more secure and verifiable than voting.</p><p><strong>Key Differences</strong></p><ul><li><strong>Voting is anonymous</strong> and banking is not.</li><li><strong>There’s a paper trail.</strong>Bank customers can match transaction records and see if the exact amount listed on their check for example is in their account. A voter-verifiable paper trail does not exist.</li><li><strong>Money can be followed</strong> to see where it ends up. There is a forensic trail. Vote hacking would involve simply switching votes between candidates making the source harder to track.</li><li><strong>Online banking isn’t actually that secure.</strong> Credit card fraud <a href="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/payment-card-fraud-losses-reach-27-85-billion-300963232.html">cost $28 billion</a> in 2018. Banks are willing to tolerate a even absorb a high level of fraud, but any level of election hacking could throw entire result into question.</li></ul><p><strong>But we should be looking at ATMs vs voting.</strong> That is a more of a useful apples to apples comparison. Bank touchscreens will email a receipt and print one. A printed receipt makes voting secure on touchscreen. But <a href="https://www.inquirer.com/philly/news/politics/pennsylvania-voting-machines-old-hack-paper-trail-20180330.html">Pennsylvania</a> could not have a recount in 2016 because their touchscreens didn’t printout a paper backup paper ballot.</p><p><strong>We may have anonymity on who you cast your vote for, but who votes and party affiliation is public information in most states.</strong> When not public, political parties and candidates have access. And many mail-in-voting systems let voters check that their vote has been counted. States like Oregon give voters tracking information so they can see if there were any problems with their ballot. The system won’t tell people which candidates their vote counted for, but there is piece of mind in knowing the ballot was received and valid.</p><h2 id="links">Links</h2><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/09/why-online-voting-is-harder-than-online-banking/"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Why online voting is harder than online banking</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">A common argument for online voting doesn’t actually make sense.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/themes/ars/assets/img/material-ars-db41652381.png" alt="Experts warn online voting will not be as secure as online banking, but they are asking the wrong question"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Timothy B. Lee</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">Ars Technica</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/GettyImages-1199502793-760x380.jpg" alt="Experts warn online voting will not be as secure as online banking, but they are asking the wrong question"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.inquirer.com/philly/news/politics/pennsylvania-voting-machines-old-hack-paper-trail-20180330.html"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Most Pa. voting machines are old, hackable, and will likely be used to count the 2020 votes</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">Pennsylvania ranks second in the nation for the number of registered voters casting ballots on older, hackable machines with no paper trail. At a time when elections may be in peril from foreign interference, counties are slow to update their vulnerable equipment.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://media.inquirer.com/designimages/touch-icon-192x192.png" alt="Experts warn online voting will not be as secure as online banking, but they are asking the wrong question"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Katlyn Alo and Jackie Botts, For the Inquirer</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">The Philadelphia Inquirer</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://www.inquirer.com/resizer/0wCZ53HgDQP9f4BJ79KWWIU4H1Q&#x3D;/1200x0/center/middle/www.inquirer.com/resizer/L45dnREZ4a83p-F7UaIh7C26Bys&#x3D;/1200x0/center/middle/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-pmn.s3.amazonaws.com/public/OUXP4RPUJJBT3JE3TRSDANGERM.jpg" alt="Experts warn online voting will not be as secure as online banking, but they are asking the wrong question"/></div></a></figure>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Technical and human error more likely to disrupt election than hacks]]></title><description><![CDATA[Technology meant to fail-proof elections is having the opposite effect a new investigative report finds.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/markup-deep-dive-on-voting-machine-problems/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f5e9890c7f7500039bfdf66</guid><category><![CDATA[Voting Machines]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Wojciechowski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2020 22:15:15 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1466780446965-2072a3de8a43?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&amp;q=80&amp;fm=jpg&amp;crop=entropy&amp;cs=tinysrgb&amp;w=2000&amp;fit=max&amp;ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1466780446965-2072a3de8a43?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&q=80&fm=jpg&crop=entropy&cs=tinysrgb&w=2000&fit=max&ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" alt="Technical and human error more likely to disrupt election than hacks"/><p>Beware of paper jams, old machines and confused poll workers. What’s causing long lines at the polls? Adrianne Jeffries investigated the technical issues and human error for <a href="https://themarkup.org/ask-the-markup/2020/09/10/broken-voting-machines-election-day">The Markup</a> that should worry us as November 3 approaches.</p><p>She found:</p><ul><li>Voters taller than six-feet experienced an optical illusion that made votes appear to <a href="https://arktimes.com/arkansas-blog/2006/05/19/tall-voters-at-disadvantage">flip in Arkansas</a>.</li><li>Workers during the primary in a Michigan precinct blew the power because they had too many Crock-Pots plugged in to cook food over the long day.</li><li><a href="https://bradblog.com/Docs/VSAP-LACountyBoard-Report_042720.pdf">1200 new machines</a> this year in L.A. County (5% of the total) failed due to faulty printers.</li><li>Many of the machines bought as part of the Help America Vote Act in 2002, following the 2000 debacle, have not been upgraded.</li></ul><p>But the real culprit is chronic underfunding at both the state and national levels. This will be worsened by the lack of in-person training in many locations as part of COVID-19 safety restrictions this November. Eight-hour long lines in Georgia during their June primary were mostly the result of poorly trained workers operating brand new technology. We are in for a bumpy ride.</p><h2 id="links">Links</h2><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://themarkup.org/ask-the-markup/2020/09/10/broken-voting-machines-election-day"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Why Do Voting Machines Break on Election Day? – The Markup</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">Power outages, paper jams, and ancient technology are more likely culprits than hackers</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://mrkp-static-production.themarkup.org/static/img/social-icons/apple-touch-icon.png" alt="Technical and human error more likely to disrupt election than hacks"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Adrianne Jeffries</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">The Markup</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://mrkp-static-production.themarkup.org/uploads/2020/09/voting-machines-1200x628.jpg" alt="Technical and human error more likely to disrupt election than hacks"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://arktimes.com/arkansas-blog/2006/05/19/tall-voters-at-disadvantage"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Tall voters at disadvantage? - Arkansas Times</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">Pulaski County election officials yesterday took a touch-screen voting machine out of operation at the Laman Library precinct in North Little Rock because some voters complained it was registering the wrong selections.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://237995-729345-1-raikfcquaxqncofqfm.stackpathdns.com/wp-content/themes/Newspaper-child/assets/ios-touch/256.png" alt="Technical and human error more likely to disrupt election than hacks"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Warwick Sabin</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">Arkansas Times</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://237995-729345-1-raikfcquaxqncofqfm.stackpathdns.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ShareDefault_Facebook.png" alt="Technical and human error more likely to disrupt election than hacks"/></div></a></figure>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wisconsin ordered to halt mailing ballots, may need to reprint 2 million]]></title><description><![CDATA[Republican justices throw the election into chaos with deadlines fast-approaching.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/wisconsin-ordered-to-reprint-ballots/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f5b5944f42caa00395a2cdc</guid><category><![CDATA[Voting by Mail]]></category><category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Count Every Vote Team]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:09:51 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/52A99D90-5BAD-41EA-A631-341D9E05ADD8.jpeg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/52A99D90-5BAD-41EA-A631-341D9E05ADD8.jpeg" alt="Wisconsin ordered to halt mailing ballots, may need to reprint 2 million"/><p>The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled in a 4–3 decision to halt mailing of ballots as justices decide if the Green Party presidential ticket should be added. The Republican justices who make up the majority all supported the stay.</p><p><strong>The Problem</strong>:</p><ul><li><strong>2.3 million ballots</strong> may need to be redesigned, tested, printed.</li><li><strong>387,000 ballots</strong> have already been mailed to voters.</li></ul><p><strong>Counties don’t think they can pull this off:</strong></p><blockquote>If we do not send our file to the printer tomorrow, we will likely not be able to meet the statutory deadline.<br>— Jefferson County</br></blockquote><blockquote>If Milwaukee County is forced to stop printing, and begin designing, testing, and printing a new ballot, we will not be able to meet the state and federal deadlines.<br>— Milwaukee County</br></blockquote><h2 id="links">Links</h2><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://eu.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2020/09/10/wisconsin-supreme-court-seeks-suspend-mailing-absentee-ballots/3459007001/"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Wisconsin Supreme Court says mailing of absentee ballots should be halted while Green Party lawsuit is considered</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">The state Supreme Court told election officials Thursday that absentee ballots should not be mailed for now while the court determines whether the Green Party’s presidential ticket should be added.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://www.gannett-cdn.com/sites/jsonline/images/site-nav-logo@2x.png" alt="Wisconsin ordered to halt mailing ballots, may need to reprint 2 million"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Patrick Marley</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">Milwaukee Journal Sentinel</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2020/02/18/PMJS/7eed8bd3-821a-4a8c-aeff-450035d20a4d-VOTING_01697.JPG?crop&#x3D;3899,2194,x0,y0&amp;width&#x3D;3200&amp;height&#x3D;1801&amp;format&#x3D;pjpg&amp;auto&#x3D;webp" alt="Wisconsin ordered to halt mailing ballots, may need to reprint 2 million"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-embed-card"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">If the high court orders changes to who is on the ballot, 2.3 ballots would have to be reprinted. <br><br>Counties warn that would cost them large sums and result in them missing deadlines that require absentee ballots to be sent to voters by next week.</br></br></p>&mdash; Patrick Marley (@patrickdmarley) <a href="https://twitter.com/patrickdmarley/status/1304194621350842375?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 10, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"/>
</figure>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mailing ballots happens every election]]></title><description><![CDATA[President Trump falsely claims 80 million ballots are going out unsolicited. The reality is around 40 million will be sent out and many states conducted elections this way for decades.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/mailing-ballots-happens-every-election/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f5b4f77f42caa00395a2cb5</guid><category><![CDATA[Voting by Mail]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Wojciechowski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:28:49 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/DB0A968A-F8F0-4870-B134-6BC22E2DCB05.png" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://vote.ghost.io/content/images/2020/09/DB0A968A-F8F0-4870-B134-6BC22E2DCB05.png" alt="Mailing ballots happens every election"/><p>President Trump continues to warn that 80 million ballots are being sent unsolicited to voters. He is most likely misquoting an August New York Times article talking about the number of mail-in-ballots that will be received by election officials. Many of those are mailed out every election and half that number that will be requested by voters, not "unsolicited."</p><p><strong>Five states have run elections by mail for years:</strong></p><ul><li>Colorado</li><li>Oregon</li><li>Washington</li><li>Hawaii</li><li>Utah</li></ul><p><strong>Some states are mailing ballots to all voters due to COVID-19 worries:</strong></p><ul><li>California</li><li>Nevada</li><li>New Jersey</li><li>Vermont</li><li>Washington, D.C.</li></ul><p><a href="https://missoulacurrent.com/government/2020/08/all-mail-ballots/">Montana is allowing counties</a> to choose to conduct all voting by mail.</p><p><strong>44.4 million ballots</strong> are being sent to registered voter in those states. Barely half of Trump’s 80 million claim.</p><p>The <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/08/11/us/politics/vote-by-mail-us-states.html">Times article</a> stated:</p><blockquote>80 million mail ballots will flood election offices this fall.</blockquote><p>This is twice the number as usual, but 40 million are voters requesting absentee ballots.</p><p><em>(Graphic via <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/08/11/us/politics/vote-by-mail-us-states.html">FlowingData</a>)</em></p><h2 id="links">Links</h2><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/08/11/us/politics/vote-by-mail-us-states.html"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Where Americans Can Vote by Mail in the 2020 Elections</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">More Americans will vote by mail this fall than ever before, as states expand mail voting laws in response to the coronavirus pandemic.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Juliette Love</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">The New York Times</span></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://static01.nyt.com/images/2020/08/07/us/2020-election-mail-voting-promo-1596854136142/2020-election-mail-voting-promo-1596854136142-facebookJumbo-v8.png" alt="Mailing ballots happens every election"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/sep/10/donald-trump/trumps-misleading-claim-about-unsolicited-mail-bal/"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">PolitiFact - Trump’s misleading claim about ‘unsolicited’ mail ballots</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">PolitiFact is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://static.politifact.com/images/apple-touch-icon.png" alt="Mailing ballots happens every election"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Donald Trump</span><span class="kg-bookmark-publisher">@politifact</span></img></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://static.politifact.com/politifact/rulings/meter-mostly-false.jpg" alt="Mailing ballots happens every election"/></div></a></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-embed-card"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sending out 80 MILLION BALLOTS to people who aren’t even asking for a Ballot is unfair and a total fraud in the making. Look at what’s going on right now!</p>&mdash; Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1304040627332689920?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 10, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"/>
</figure>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Election Day Nightmares Center on Disinformation]]></title><description><![CDATA[Experts warn that bad actors don’t actually need to violate the integrity of the elections, they just need to suggest the election was stolen.]]></description><link>https://vote.ghost.io/election-nightmares/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">Ghost__Post__5f594077a6c4c200394166e1</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Wojciechowski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 20:56:01 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1598519308760-ea03e7d45e4a?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&amp;q=80&amp;fm=jpg&amp;crop=entropy&amp;cs=tinysrgb&amp;w=2000&amp;fit=max&amp;ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1598519308760-ea03e7d45e4a?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&q=80&fm=jpg&crop=entropy&cs=tinysrgb&w=2000&fit=max&ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjExNzczfQ" alt="Election Day Nightmares Center on Disinformation"/><p>The <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/09/opinion/election-security-trump.html">New York Times</a> asked seven security and election experts to weigh in on what nightmare scenarios might look like as polls close on November 3.</p><p><strong>Disinformation campaigns by Russia</strong> or internal actors pose the biggest threat, largely because it requires only activated networks that already exist.</p><p><strong>False flags</strong> could work by claiming that China hacked into election systems to throw the race to Biden. It is frighteningly easy As we’ve learned recently around COVID-19 and Black Lives Matter protests.</p><p>Other scenarios involve the shutdown of polling places due to a lack of poll workers and COVID-19 issues. But the use of disinformation to sow distrust or give cover for a candidate to challenge the results appears dangerous and likely.</p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>